Arctic Sea Ice Far More Fragile Than Satellites Indicated
Much less ice for polar bears, expert says
Surveyby ship finds satellite data about thicker Arctic ice was wrong
The Associated Press, Nov . 27, 2009
Arctic
sea ice conditions are even worse than feared after a survey found that
ice detected as older and thicker by satellites is actually thin and
fragile, a prominent Canadian researcher reported Friday.
University
of Manitoba researcher David Barber said experts around the world
believed the ice was recovering because satellite images showed it
expanding, but the thick, multiyear frozen sheets have been replaced by
thin ice that cannot support the weight of a polar bear.
"Polar
bears are being restricted to a small fringe of where this multiyear
sea ice is. As we went further and further north, we saw less and less
polar bears because this ice wasn't even strong enough for the polar
bears to stand on," said Barber, who returned from an expedition to the
Beaufort Sea in September.
Barber
said permanent ice, which is normally up to 30 feet thick, was easily
pierced by the research icebreaker he and his team were on.
The
deterioration has far-reaching consequences for the North and its
iconic mammal. Polar bears that rely on the permanent ice to survive
the summer have fewer and fewer places of refuge, said Barber, who has
been studying the Arctic ecosystem for 25 years.
Bears eating bears for food?
Scientists also said Friday that shrinking Arctic sea ice may be forcing some hungry polar bears to cannibalize bear cubs.
At
least seven cases of mature male polar bears eating bear cubs have been
spotted this year among the animals around Churchill, Manitoba, said
Ian Stirling, a retired Environment Canada biologist who specializes in
the Churchill bears.
Stirling said evidence suggests the cubs are being killed for food, not just so the male can mate with the sow.
He
said the Hudson Bay sea ice, which the bears use to hunt the seals they
consume to fatten up for winter, isn't appearing until weeks later than
it used to.
The
sea ice findings, which are soon to be published in the peer-reviewed
journal Geophysical Research Letters, come as a shock to experts
worldwide.
Although
northern sea ice hit a record low in 2007, researchers believed it was
recovering because of what they were seeing on satellite images.
But
the satellites the experts relied on were misleading because the rotten
ice looked sturdy on the surface and has a similar superficial
temperature, Barber explained.
"The
satellites give us only part of the story. The multiyear ice is
disappearing and it's almost all gone now from the northern
hemisphere."
Ice floe breaks up in 5 minutes
Barber
said his team finally reached what it thought was stable ice, only to
watch a crack appear just as researchers were preparing to descend onto
the floe.
"As
I watched, over the course of five minutes, the entire multiyear ice
floe broke up into pieces. This floe was 10 miles across," said Barber,
who holds the Canada research chair in Arctic science at the University
of Manitoba.
The
ice is unable to withstand battering waves and storms because global
warming is rapidly melting it at a rate of 27,000 square miles each
year, he said.
Multiyear
sea ice used to cover 90 percent of the Arctic basin, Barber said. It
now covers roughly 19 percent. Where it used to be up to 33 feet thick,
it's now 6 feet at most.
The
lack of sea ice may be good news to some who want to see the North
opened to industry. Without thick ice blocking the way, ships can more
easily gain access to the Arctic's natural resources.
"We
were doing almost the same speed we'd do in open water through what we
thought was multiyear sea ice," Barber said. "Transportation and all
the issues of navigation across the pole all become very real when you
no longer have any multiyear sea ice."